Re: Don't link to 5.0 publicly yet because...

[Andy Shimp <andy.shimp@yale.edu>]

Switching back and forth seems like a bad idea from a user perspective.
Can't we just assume we are operating under the contract we signed?

-Andy

At 01:46 PM 2/6/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Kim,
>some of us switched a month ago. We can change the URLs back, but can you
>supply them? (We didn't save the old information.)
>Julie
>
>On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Kimberly Parker wrote:
>
>> Eek -- I just noticed that the new interface has a click-through license
>> right on the front screen of the SP window and it is problematic (and not
>> what we signed ages ago with SP).
>>
>> Before this goes out in front of our public, I need to communicate with SP
>> seeing if we can remove that or link instead to the actual thing we signed
>> or something equally acceptable.
>>
>> --Kim
>>
>> >There is a new click through license agreement that Silverplatter has put
>> >in place for version 5 of their databases.  This new license has clauses
>> >(e.g. an indemnification clause) that are problematic for us.
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Kimberly Parker
>> Electronic Publishing & Collections Libn
>> SML 225 or Med Lib TS
>> 432-0067 or 785-7116
>> mailto:kimberly.parker@yale.edu
>>