Re: Fwd: strange SilverPlatter experience

[Kimberly Parker <kimberly.parker@yale.edu>]

I should have said "one more field".  There must be something having to do 
with a minimum number of fields showing that eliminates this problem.

Andy noticed that Abstract and *H fields which had shown briefly after we 
requested them to be added.  I'm not sure why they vanished again, but I've 
asked for them to come back.  At least the *H (field with hits) should show 
up for every database, so that should get us what we need, I hope.

--Kim

At 08:58 AM 1/29/2002 -0500, Julie Linden wrote:
>Kim,
>what are the fields that are already displaying by default?
>I don't understand why one of those (like "title") doesn't suffice - why 
>do we have to hunt for another one?
>thanks,
>Julie
>
>At 08:02 AM 1/29/2002 -0500, Kimberly Parker wrote:
>>O.K.  We only need to add one field, but it has to be one that appears in 
>>all or almost all databases.
>>
>>So gang, vote on this point.
>>
>>--Kim
>>
>>
>>>Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:53:28 -0500
>>>From: George Andrade <support@ovid.com>
>>>Reply-To: support@ovid.com
>>>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
>>>X-Accept-Language: en
>>>To: Kimberly Parker <kimberly.parker@yale.edu>
>>>Subject: Re: Fwd: strange SilverPlatter experience -- attn: George
>>>
>>>Dear Kimberly:
>>>Thank you for directing your inquiry to Ovid Technical Support.
>>>You will only need 1 field. As long has it's a field that is available 
>>>in most or
>>>all databases.
>>>
>>>If you have additional questions or problems, please contact Technical 
>>>Support
>>>further.
>>>
>>>Sincerely,
>>>
>>>George Andrade
>>>Ovid Technical Support
>>>support@Ovid.com
>>>(800)343-0064   (781)769-2599
>>>Kimberly Parker wrote:
>>>
>>> > George, we are pondering the option of adding some other default fields,
>>> > but have some additional questions.  Does it matter which ones?  Do they
>>> > have to be fields that will likely show up in most databases?  Can 
>>> they be
>>> > ones unlikely to show up in any of our databases?  What's the minimum
>>> > number of new fields to insert to eliminate the problem, etc.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for providing us some clarification.
>>> >
>>> > --Kimberly Parker