Re: Fwd: strange SilverPlatter experience

[Andy Shimp <andy.shimp@yale.edu>]

In the last round we agreed to add the abstract (AB) field, although that
doesn't seem to have happened, at least for INSPEC.  Also, I don't think
"Fields with Hits" was added (*H).

-Andy

At 08:02 AM 1/29/02 -0500, you wrote:
>O.K.  We only need to add one field, but it has to be one that appears in 
>all or almost all databases.
>
>So gang, vote on this point.
>
>--Kim
>
>
>>Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:53:28 -0500
>>From: George Andrade <support@ovid.com>
>>Reply-To: support@ovid.com
>>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
>>X-Accept-Language: en
>>To: Kimberly Parker <kimberly.parker@yale.edu>
>>Subject: Re: Fwd: strange SilverPlatter experience -- attn: George
>>
>>Dear Kimberly:
>>Thank you for directing your inquiry to Ovid Technical Support.
>>You will only need 1 field. As long has it's a field that is available in 
>>most or
>>all databases.
>>
>>If you have additional questions or problems, please contact Technical
Support
>>further.
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>
>>George Andrade
>>Ovid Technical Support
>>support@Ovid.com
>>(800)343-0064   (781)769-2599
>>Kimberly Parker wrote:
>>
>> > George, we are pondering the option of adding some other default fields,
>> > but have some additional questions.  Does it matter which ones?  Do they
>> > have to be fields that will likely show up in most databases?  Can they be
>> > ones unlikely to show up in any of our databases?  What's the minimum
>> > number of new fields to insert to eliminate the problem, etc.
>> >
>> > Thanks for providing us some clarification.
>> >
>> > --Kimberly Parker