Re: Fwd: silverplatter displays

[Betty Cohen <Betty.Cohen@yale.edu>]

I like Emily's suggestion.  It would be nice to add the abstract to the
default, and remove the accession number and secondary source ID, unless
they are needed for ILL purposes.

At 09:39 AM 4/28/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>[I originally sent my response to Kim; she's asked me to post it here.]
>
>Kim - I'd like to see the abstract included in the default display.  Are
>there other fields that could be removed, like Accession Number?  Or would
>this affect Interlibrary Loan?
>
>--Emily
>
>Emily J. Horning
>Librarian for Philosophy and Coordinator, Reference Collections
>Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University
>New Haven, CT 06520-8240
>emily.horning@yale.edu    **    (203) 432-8211
>
>On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Kimberly Parker wrote:
>>
>>> Ladies and Gents, this is something that would need to be changed for all
>>> SilverPlatter files if we do it.  Is there a consensus on the subject?
>>> 
>>> --Kim
>>> 
>>> >Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 12:08:33 -0400
>>> >From: Betty Cohen <Betty.Cohen@yale.edu>
>>> >Subject: silverplatter
>>> >X-Sender: bc76@email.med.yale.edu
>>> >To: kimberly.parker@yale.edu
>>> >X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
>>> >
>>> >Kim:
>>> >I've been doing a fair amount of searching and helping patrons in SP
>>> >databases recently, and I noticed that our default setting is to have
>>> >citations display without abstracts.  In order to get the abstract view,
>>> >the user has to change the settings.  Can we change this so that abstract
>>> >appears in the default like it does in OVID?
>>> >Betty
>>> > 
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Kimberly Parker
>>> Electronic Publishing & Collections Libn
>>> SML 606 or Med Lib TS
>>> 432-0067 or 785-7116
>>> mailto:kimberly.parker@yale.edu
>>> 
>> 
>
>